{"id":5287,"date":"2016-02-15T22:01:32","date_gmt":"2016-02-16T03:01:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.trinitydc.edu\/president\/?p=5287"},"modified":"2016-02-16T08:49:06","modified_gmt":"2016-02-16T13:49:06","slug":"preserve-protect-defend-the-constitution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.trinitydc.edu\/president\/2016\/02\/preserve-protect-defend-the-constitution\/","title":{"rendered":"Preserve, Protect, Defend the Constitution!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.trinitydc.edu\/president\/files\/2016\/02\/antonin_scalia-photograph.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-5292\" src=\"http:\/\/www.trinitydc.edu\/president\/files\/2016\/02\/antonin_scalia-photograph-320x400.jpg\" alt=\"antonin_scalia-photograph\" width=\"320\" height=\"400\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.trinitydc.edu\/president\/files\/2016\/02\/antonin_scalia-photograph-320x400.jpg 320w, https:\/\/www.trinitydc.edu\/president\/files\/2016\/02\/antonin_scalia-photograph-104x130.jpg 104w, https:\/\/www.trinitydc.edu\/president\/files\/2016\/02\/antonin_scalia-photograph-160x200.jpg 160w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 320px) 100vw, 320px\" \/><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.oyez.org\/justices\/antonin_scalia\">(Photo of Justice Scalia, Supreme Court collection, Oyez website)<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The death of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2016\/02\/14\/us\/antonin-scalia-death.html\">Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia<\/a> is, by any measure, a great sorrow for his family, a source of deep sadness for his colleagues and a tremendous loss for the nation&#8217;s jurisprudence.\u00a0 Agree or disagree with his strict constructionist reasoning and deeply conservative ideology, few can argue with Justice Scalia&#8217;s passionate commitment to the rule of law and the vitality of the Constitution.<\/p>\n<p>What Justice Scalia&#8217;s death should not be is an occasion for a Constitutional crisis fomented by shameful political grandstanding, reckless demagoguery and dangerous\u00a0disregard for the very clear\u00a0Constitutional principles\u00a0that govern filling Supreme Court vacancies.\u00a0 Article II Section 2 of the Constitution of the United States declares that the President of the United States &#8220;shall&#8221; nominate justices of the Supreme Court with the &#8220;advice and consent&#8221; of the United States Senate.\u00a0 Nothing about this clause is obscure.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/the-fix\/wp\/2016\/02\/15\/why-senate-republicans-made-a-big-mistake-on-the-supreme-court-opening\/?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_courtobama-925pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory\">some politicians<\/a> showed outrageous disrespect for Justice Scalia by announcing, within hours of his death, that they would obstruct any nomination that President Obama makes to fill the seat vacated by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2016\/02\/16\/us\/politics\/what-would-antonin-scalia-want-in-his-successor-a-dissent-offers-clues.html?hp&amp;action=click&amp;pgtype=Homepage&amp;clickSource=story-heading&amp;module=first-column-region&amp;region=top-news&amp;WT.nav=top-news&amp;_r=0\">Justice Scalia&#8217;s<\/a> death.\u00a0 In so doing, they clearly deny the authority and duty of the President, and they abridge their own legal duty to &#8220;advise and consent&#8221; in a timely way.<\/p>\n<p>Members of the United States Senate take an oath of office to uphold the Constitution.\u00a0 Those Senators who have vowed to obstruct the Supreme Court nomination process should resign their seats immediately.\u00a0 They have indicated a clear intent to violate their oaths of office.\u00a0 Moreover, they raise a dangerous spectacle of destabilizing the balance of powers established by the Constitution by flagrantly demeaning and disparaging the Constitutional authority of the President.\u00a0 It&#8217;s one thing to reject a nominee he presents after fair consideration; it&#8217;s quite another to announce a flagrant plan to obstruct the nomination no matter the qualifications of the candidate.<\/p>\n<p>In the same vein, presidential candidates who call for obstructing the nominating process clearly display a level of contempt for Constitutional government that is breathtaking.\u00a0 How can any candidate stand for election to an office that requires an oath to uphold the Constitution if\u00a0a large premise of the candidate&#8217;s campaign is to undermine the Constitution and the presidency?<\/p>\n<p>Both the senators and candidates who are engaged in this wanton effort to thwart the duly authorized <a href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/blogs\/pundits-blog\/the-judiciary\/269486-what-the-constitution-has-to-say-about-the-supreme-court\">nominating process<\/a> have taken the position that the nomination must wait for &#8220;the next president&#8221; on the theory that &#8220;the voice of the people&#8221; must be heard.\u00a0 What a travesty!\u00a0 President Obama is the current president, elected twice by &#8220;the voice of the people.&#8221;\u00a0 Nothing in the Constitution says that a president&#8217;s duties wane in his final year in office.\u00a0 Nominating a new justice for the Supreme Court is not like holding back discretionary legislation.\u00a0 Filling the seat is essential for the proper functioning of our government.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, naked political motivations are the entire and only reason for this mess.\u00a0 Those who are trying to thwart the nomination have the arrogant belief that they will win the presidential election and thus be able to appoint a justice of their liking.\u00a0 In so doing, they are creating a political and ideological trap for Scalia&#8217;s successor.\u00a0 No Supreme Court justice should\u00a0 be beholden to such circumstances. Jurists and lawyers of all ideologies should reject this pathetic manipulation of the vital role of the Supreme Court in American life.\u00a0 The intemperate and shameful political grandstanding of just the last 48 hours taints any nomination coming now or later &#8212; any nominee would be risking his or her ultimate reputation for independence and arms-length legal reasoning, appearing, instead, to be a stooge of one side or the other.<\/p>\n<p>The obstructionists claim &#8220;80 years of precedent&#8221; to support their view that a &#8220;lame duck&#8221; president should not make a nomination in an election year.\u00a0 They are so wrong!\u00a0 First of all, there are few precedents for the death of a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/\">Supreme Court<\/a> justice in office, let alone in an election year.\u00a0 The implication of the &#8220;80 years of precedent&#8221; claim is that President Obama deliberately picked this particular moment to make a nomination.\u00a0\u00a0 This affront to common decency &#8212; the implication that President Obama somehow manipulated the process to create this vacancy &#8212; is only topped by the complete lack of common sense and truthfulness.\u00a0 Death happens on nobody&#8217;s schedule.\u00a0 The duty of both the president and Senate is not to hurl accusations about who killed Scalia in an election year (and, oh my, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/post-nation\/wp\/2016\/02\/15\/conspiracy-theories-swirl-around-the-death-of-antonin-scalia\/?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_conspiracies-215pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory\">conspiracy theories <\/a>are already rampant!) but how to proceed as responsible, ethical leaders of the republic.<\/p>\n<p>The obstructionists are also simply wrong on the facts about those 80 years.\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2016\/02\/16\/opinion\/in-election-years-a-history-of-confirming-court-nominees.html?action=click&amp;pgtype=Homepage&amp;clickSource=story-heading&amp;module=opinion-c-col-left-region&amp;region=opinion-c-col-left-region&amp;WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region\">Across the history of the Supreme Court,<\/a> many justices have been nominated and confirmed during election years, and as recently as the appointment of Justice Anthony Kennedy in 1988.\u00a0 The obstructionists don&#8217;t seem to care much about facts or duty.<\/p>\n<p>We the People deserve better, and we must demand that the politicians stop this ugly game of manipulation of bedrock institutions of government. It&#8217;s been a long time since certain political leaders actually showed the kind of leadership we need.\u00a0 Instead of leadership, we get pandering, demagoguery and obstruction.\u00a0 Congress is at a standstill.\u00a0 Legislation cannot move forward.\u00a0 Presidential candidates spend more time insulting each other than laying out real policy solutions.<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, this nation is ill-served by the toxic politics we&#8217;ve witnessed for too long.\u00a0 Whatever your party, whatever your candidate preference, We, the People, must insist on an end to this ugly and dangerous political situation.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_5288\" style=\"width: 550px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.trinitydc.edu\/president\/files\/2016\/02\/Constitution-photo.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-5288\" class=\"size-large wp-image-5288\" src=\"http:\/\/www.trinitydc.edu\/president\/files\/2016\/02\/Constitution-photo-545x400.jpg\" alt=\"USA Constitution Parchment\" width=\"540\" height=\"396\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.trinitydc.edu\/president\/files\/2016\/02\/Constitution-photo-545x400.jpg 545w, https:\/\/www.trinitydc.edu\/president\/files\/2016\/02\/Constitution-photo-177x130.jpg 177w, https:\/\/www.trinitydc.edu\/president\/files\/2016\/02\/Constitution-photo-273x200.jpg 273w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 540px) 100vw, 540px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-5288\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">USA Constitution Parchment<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The death of Justice Scalia is a great sorrow for his family and sad loss for many, but it should not be used as an excuse for politicians to create a Constitutional crisis.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":51,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[1593,1588,126,1590,1589,360,1592,1031,436,1591,470],"class_list":["post-5287","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-advise-and-consent","tag-antonin-scalia","tag-constitution","tag-constitution-article-2","tag-justice-scalia","tag-president-obama","tag-presidential-powers","tag-scotus","tag-supreme-court","tag-supreme-court-nomination-process","tag-u-s-senate"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.trinitydc.edu\/president\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5287","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.trinitydc.edu\/president\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.trinitydc.edu\/president\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.trinitydc.edu\/president\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/51"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.trinitydc.edu\/president\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5287"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.trinitydc.edu\/president\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5287\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.trinitydc.edu\/president\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5287"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.trinitydc.edu\/president\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5287"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.trinitydc.edu\/president\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5287"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}