|
1
|
- Defining the Task Ahead
- Deborah G. Litt, Ph.D.
- Trinity (Washington) University
- January 29, 2007
|
|
2
|
- Define the problem
- (Come closer to defining it)
- Gain some new understandings about the factors involved in comprehending
text
- Provide a technique you can use right away
|
|
3
|
- Jot down your ideas on the stickies
- ONE explanation per stickie
- Attach to paper in the “BEFORE” column
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- One person reads while the partner observes
- Reader will read text from another discipline and try to understand it
- Reader will try to remember what s/he is thinking about while reading
|
|
6
|
- Observer will observe & take notes on what the reader is doing while
reading
- At signal, observer stops reader and asks reader what s/he was doing and
thinking to make sense of the text
- Debrief & collect as much information as possible on reader’s
thoughts and actions while trying to make sense of this piece of text
|
|
7
|
- 5 minutes -- read/observe
- 3 minutes -- reader explains efforts; observer takes notes
|
|
8
|
- First reader becomes observer
|
|
9
|
- How did it feel to read the challenging text?
- What actions did you take to try to make sense of it?
- Keep track of what was said (large index card)
|
|
10
|
- Give up
- Feel like giving up
- Reread sections
- Sum up as we go along
- Link or relate to other things we know or have previously read
- Use knowledge of parts of words to figure out meanings of unfamiliar
words
|
|
11
|
- Skim ahead to get an overview first
- Asked questions about the text
- Anticipated what was coming (predictions)
- Check-in with yourself--Does this make sense? Do I get this?
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- What insights did this activity give you into students’ reading college
level material?
- What might be getting in the way for them?
|
|
14
|
- Lack some necessary prior knowledge
- Lack vocabulary needed to access
- Not used to such long and complex sentences
- Whole new ways of thinking, reasoning
|
|
15
|
- We don’t need to try as hard!
|
|
16
|
- Make judgments about ideas presented
- Agree/disgree with ideas presented
- “Talk back” or have a conversation with the text
- Get emotionally involved
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- Comprehension does not happen automatically
- Comprehension does not happen just because the reader can pronounce or
identify the words
- It takes EFFORT to comprehend, i.e. construct meaning from text
|
|
19
|
- Difficulty understanding written text does NOT necessarily mean a
difficulty with word reading
- Necessary but NOT sufficient
|
|
20
|
- Being good at reading some types of text does not guarantee success with
other kinds of texts
- there are discipline-specific demands
|
|
21
|
- Organization (structure) of texts
- What is important and how importance is signaled
- Specialized vocabulary or specialized uses of common words
|
|
22
|
- ãWhen you
already know something about a topic, it is easier to learn more è
- ãLack of
background knowledge or prior knowledge inhibits comprehension
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- Faulty goal for reading
- Faulty understanding of how reading works
- Do not know how
|
|
25
|
- Their goal is to “get through” it, rather than to understand it
|
|
26
|
- They think if they read the words, understanding will automatically take
place
- When this doesn’t happen they attribute the failure to a lack of
intelligence or reading skill
|
|
27
|
- Don’t know how to do those things
- Limited strategies for constructing meaning in an intentional way
- Know how to do them on some types of text, i.e., stories, but not
others-- math, philosophy, economics, biology
|
|
28
|
- Insufficient prior knowledge to access the text
|
|
29
|
- Some know how, but it seems like too much effort so they don’t bother
- Issue of will rather than skill
- Also electronic distractions
|
|
30
|
- Makes skilled reading visible to students
- Show them what the conversation inside your sounds like
- Demonstrates what reading challenging text “looks like”--counters
passive approach to text
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
- Restated in my own words (frequently)
- Reread
- Made links to prior knowledge
- Intentional effort to recall information learned in the past
|
|
37
|
- Drew upon knowledge of word roots
- Drew upon knowledge of the structure of academic journal articles
- Made decisions regarding the level of detailed understanding required
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
- Practice first
- Put yourself in the position of your students
- “Fake” confusions that track their confusions so you will model what you
want them to do
- Begin with demonstrating only 1 or 2 strategies
|
|
40
|
- Jot down your ideas on the stickies
- ONE explanation per stickie
- Attach to paper in the “AFTER” column
|
|
41
|
- Determine which factors apply to our students
- Seek and select strategies that best address those factors
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
- Nist & Simpson, “College Studying” www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp?HREF=handbook/index.html
- Academic Literacy: A Statement of Competencies Expected of Students
Entering California's Public Colleges and Universities
www.academicsenate.cc.ca.us/Publications/Papers/AcademicLiteracy/main.htm
|