Trinity University

Evaluation of

2005-2006 [Program Name] Assessment

Year 2

 

 

Reviewer:

                                               

Report Prepared by:

 

Evaluation submitted:  [Date approved by committee]

 

 

UCAP evaluates program assessments based on the criteria outlined in its Second Year Protocol for program assessment reports.  Each required element of the program’s report is rated as either meeting the standard or needing revision.   Additional comments and suggestions are provided for elements of the report that require revision.  A summary of UCAP recommendations for revision and, when necessary, re-submission is provided at the end of this evaluation.

 

Task 1: Implement data collection plan from the First Year Assessment report.

 

Evaluation Criteria

Needs Revision

Meets Standard

Qualitative and quantitative data is sufficient to measure the achievement of program objectives.

 

 

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Evaluation Criteria

Needs Revision

Meets Standard

All data has been collected.

 

 

Data is presented in an easily understandable format by means of charts, matrices, tables, etc.

 

 

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

Task 3:  Draft report and present findings to UCAP Committee.

 

Evaluation Criteria

Needs Revision

Meets Standard

The report summarizes the program’s assessment activities.

 

 

The report includes examples of developed instruments and collected data.

 

 

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

UCAP Committee Recommendations: